20-11-21, 09:49 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 46
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by David C
That's exactly why I thought it would be a good choice. In basic form it should be very dependable with plenty of torque. Pretty much the performance Bristol were chasing with the 160 engine intended for the 220 chassis. What a shame that never saw the light of day
|
Yes, I watched the video recording of an interview with Syd Lovesy in which he talks about the 160 project. The intended engine for the 220 prototype being designed by Denis Sevier apparently came to nothing and as they say... the rest is history.
Last edited by Raymond; 20-11-21 at 10:21 PM.
|
Threaded Mode