Bristol Cars - Owners and Enthusiasts Forum  

Go Back   Bristol Cars - Owners and Enthusiasts Forum > Bristol Forums > 6 cyl Bristol cars

6 cyl Bristol cars Type 400 to 406 - restoration, repair, maintenance etc

NEW CAR AGAIN.... 1956 Bristol 405 CHASSIS - 4106. 405GMT

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 19-11-21, 10:28 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: cheshire
Posts: 77
Default

started to strip paint off bonnet hopefully get a few panels done this weekend !
Attached Images
File Type: jpg b1.jpg (759.1 KB, 14 views)
File Type: jpg b2.jpg (495.3 KB, 8 views)
File Type: jpg b4.jpg (514.3 KB, 15 views)
File Type: jpg b5.jpg (667.6 KB, 11 views)
File Type: jpg b3.jpg (578.8 KB, 16 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 19-11-21, 10:51 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 55
Default

I have an Austin Swallow which has aluminium body. When I did the body I took it all down to the bare metal and used an etching primer before applying any filler or paint.

The problem we have at the moment is dampness in the air. Even in a dry garage my hygrometer is reading high humidity. Ideally, it should read no more than 50% or there is a risk of micro blistering.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 20-11-21, 08:25 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 393
Default

I didn't get the tape measure out but the BMW E9 engine idea came about when I was helping a friend restore a 3 litre CS. It looked to me as though it would be a reasonably easy fit, but I stand to be corrected.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 20-11-21, 08:40 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 55
Talking

David, you do realise how powerful that lump can be; especially in 3 litre guise?

I was able to keep up with a CSi up to about 90 MPH in my Triumph GT6 but then it just left me behind as it disappeared into the distance!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 20-11-21, 08:45 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 393
Default

That's exactly why I thought it would be a good choice. In basic form it should be very dependable with plenty of torque. Pretty much the performance Bristol were chasing with the 160 engine intended for the 220 chassis. What a shame that never saw the light of day
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 20-11-21, 08:48 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 393
Default

With twin carbs it shouldn't take too much work to fit and wouldn't have silly power.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 20-11-21, 08:49 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 55
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David C View Post
That's exactly why I thought it would be a good choice. In basic form it should be very dependable with plenty of torque. Pretty much the performance Bristol were chasing with the 160 engine intended for the 220 chassis. What a shame that never saw the light of day
Yes, I watched the video recording of an interview with Syd Lovesy in which he talks about the 160 project. The intended engine for the 220 prototype being designed by Denis Sevier apparently came to nothing and as they say... the rest is history.

Last edited by Raymond; 20-11-21 at 09:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 20-11-21, 09:55 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: cheshire
Posts: 77
Default

Raymond,

Are you referring to the actual ally panels micro blistering or the paint work in this humidity ?

DavidC,

If it fits i would really be very interested in dropping one into the 405 !


I love power haha ! I wouldn't mind a Bristol Sleeper !

Indeed setup with Zenith or Weber Carbs it should be just right !
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
1956, 405


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:45 AM.


This is the live site

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2