Bristol alternatives.

[Kevin H]

Originally Posted by Ashley James

The Jensen CV8 MKIII has the 6.75 Litre engine, is beautifully made,
looks astonishing and is a hoot to drive. It's my favourite of all
the US engined Europeans, although the Facel Vega is a pretty
amazing coachbuilt car too. The detail work in stainless steel is
very clever indeed.

Ashley

But would you get a good one of either of those for GBP15k ?

Originally Posted by Stuart

Interesting that Alfa doesn't seem to have featured in this thread?
Stuart

Given the initial post I thought we were only considering cars in the 1960s and 70s that were comparable to a V8 Bristol. Did Alfa make anything that fitted that criteria?

[potential]

Originally Posted by Kevin Howard

Did Alfa make anything that fitted that criteria?

I can't think of anything from Alfa that's a direct competitor, the Montreal appeals but I'd have to be completely mad to buy one

Originally Posted by Peter.Kent

Other suggestions: keep with Lancia. The Gamma was a fantastic car, whether in Berlinetta or Coupe mode. Either look great. Fantastic handling, more than adequate performance from the 2.5 flat 4. Early ones shed cam belts but I think the design was put right with the fuel injected models. It's the last true Lancia. Those that followed were Fiats. Wouldn't cost a lot either. Peter

I do love the external shape of the Gamma Coupé but I'm not sure I'd enjoy staring at that dash board every day.

Speaking of Fiats, the 130 Coupé looks like a lovely car.

[Rubbond]

Dear all of you,
Love your website, Think you're all great albeit a bit/ bit very quirky.
When I was a boy I used to fly from Hurn airport in Hampshire to Cherbourg
in France, in a Bristol aeroplane that I thought was called a Bristol City,
but that could be a mistake I made (after nearly 50 years) remembering the
term Bristol "Cities".
On the plane there were just 12 passenger seats, leather to boot, and I
think there were also still parachutes on board.
Below there was space for 3 cars. I can remember one Aston Martin amongst
them when I flew in 1962. Probably a DB4.
Only the rich could afford to fly then, with or without their car.
Those were the days, my friend. (this is not a McCain quote).
On the other subjects, my goodness. Who really could care a sh*t about
electric rear windows?
Or am I mad?
Andrew Knox.

[406Special]

It did occur to me that the number of times the rear windows are ever opened
on a Bristol probably number on the fingers of one hand, unless of course
you carry fresh air fanatical passengers. Otherwise they probably never get
touched, so why give a S**t as “rubbond” suggests.

Making the rear windows electric would simply make the car more complex and
not that more practical. I think a better design would have the rear
windows wind down into the rear cavity (electrically or manually). Further,
if the front doors were frameless, then the whole affair could be pillarless
and that would look stunning – but a much more expensive and structurally
demanding challenge.

Now give me electric solenoid activated (or sprung cable operated) petrol
filler cap or rear boot lid any time. These changes represent more
convenience and are practical. My 406 is getting electric with back up
cable control of boot lid and fuel filler cap. The rear windows will remain
manual, although I am toying with electric front operation. My front seats
(from a BMW 3 series convertible) will be electric as well. Apart from
these few modern conveniences, I am trying to keep it as simple and easy to
maintain as possible. About that fact I do give a S**t.

[Jervaulx]

Basically, if you have front electric windows, you should have the rear ones
electric also. It also helps older and more infirm passengers in the rear
to open the window when they find it difficult to reach and open the manual
mechanism. Also, in a prestige car you should open the window in a more
gentlemanly manner by pressing a switch by slight of hand rather than if you
were in a £7000 car. I don't agree with excuses of unreliability. When you
make cars costing £150,000 and above, you find a reliable mechanism and you
fit it. Excuses smacks of laziness to develop and progress and to make the
car a better and more passenger friendly car. I also believe this has some
truth with the lack of safety features which have been proven,
overwhelmingly to save many lives.

Having said that, i am a fan of the current models from Bristol and would
recommend them.

Andrew

______________________
PREVIOUS MESSAGE FROM: potential


---Quote (Originally by Kevin Howard)---
Did Alfa make anything that fitted that criteria?
---End Quote---
I can't think of anything from Alfa that's a direct competitor, the
Montreal appeals but I'd have to be completely mad to buy one


---Quote (Originally by Peter.Kent)---
Other suggestions: keep with Lancia. The Gamma was a fantastic car,
whether in Berlinetta or Coupe mode. Either look great. Fantastic
handling, more than adequate performance from the 2.5 flat 4. Early ones
shed cam belts but I think the design was put right with the fuel injected
models. It's the last true Lancia. Those that followed were Fiats.
Wouldn't cost a lot either. Peter
---End Quote---
I do love the external shape of the Gamma Coupé but I'm not sure I'd enjoy
staring at that dash board every day.

Speaking of Fiats, the 130 Coupé looks like a lovely car.

______________________
This thread is located at:
http://www.bristolcars.info/forums/showthread.php?t=135

To unsubscribe from this forum, please visit this page:
http://www.bristolcars.info/forums/s...bscription&f=7

You may reply to this email to post a reply to the forum.
You can also begin a new thread by sending an email to

[potential]

Originally Posted by Jervaulx

Quote: electric rear windows?

Isn't there a separate thread discussing the rear windows? Personally I'd prefer hydraulic operation, or perhaps pneumatic...

[Richard Levine]

True the rear side windows even in a Blenheim, cannot be opened without
either being sat in the back seat or stopping the car and climbing past a
tilted-forward front seat to unclip the window fastener. (Same again to
close.) Not ideal, but if modern conveniences are essential then a Bristol
would not be on one's short-list.


How many more postings on this subject can everyone else take? I'm near
exhausted with it!!

Can we please end it now?

Back to mainstream "Bristolling"........ People often ask me why I
choose to drive a Bristol? What is it about Bristols that attracts me? I
reply that they are made by a team of craftsmen trained in aircraft
manufacturing skills. I point to the dash and especially the instrument pod,
housing all the dials and I ask of them "Can you not picture Biggles sat
behind this wheel?" Those of them over 50 understand immediately!

What about everyone else? How do you explain to friends and family the love
of a marque that doesn't conform?

Richard

[Kevin H]

Originally Posted by Jervaulx

... in a prestige car you should open the window in a more gentlemanly manner by pressing a switch by slight of hand rather than if you were in a £7000 car. I don't agree with excuses of unreliability. When you make cars costing £150,000 and above, you find a reliable mechanism and you fit it. Excuses smacks of laziness to develop and progress and to make the car a better and more passenger friendly car. I also believe this has some truth with the lack of safety features which have been proven, overwhelmingly to save many lives.


Andrew

I agree with you 100% Andrew.

For another example of laziness you only have to look at the air conditioning in the V8 Bristols. I don't know what they are doing today but even as late as the Blenheim 2 they were still using those ugly, inefficient "cassette" type air conditioners slung under the dash, which date back to the early 1970s. That's just a joke in a car in that price bracket.

The lack of development in the V8 Bristols is even more obvious when you look at the chassis, suspension and the power train.

However, rather than laziness this may have been down to economics. My guess is that the company was in terminal decline by the time Mr Silverton came along.

As for whether things like air con and electric rear windows matter, it all depends upon on how you use the car. If you keep your car under wraps in a dehumidified garage and drive it only on sunny Sundays then of course it doesn't matter and you should probably strive for originality. But if you want to use a classic car as a daily driver then a few niceties become more important.

I'm all for subtle/sympathetic modernisation of classic cars if they are to be used as a daily driver. The thread about electric rear windows is here .

[Des]

The 3 litre Rover suggested already, I found to make an excellent substitute
for at least the 2 litre Brizzers.
I've recently been overhauling one, to keep me occupied while I give up the
fags, and it's the first time I've been really up close to one, and many
things have surprisingly impressed me, (I'm surpressed) reminded me of my first
intimate moments with Bristols.
Set the tappets today, were left loose while running in, a right old inlet
over exhaust clusterfeck, but now the thing emulates a sewing machine, a very,
very quiet one, the distributor can actually be heard running. Now it occurs
to me that there's nothing I would want to change or modify about the Rover,
I can't say the same about the Bristol.

Best rear window opener setup I've ever seen would be late 80's 2 door
Nissan Sunny, 2 levers just behind handbrake, accessible by front or rear
occupant, operated hinged glass via cables, brilliantly simple.

[jimfoz]

Originally Posted by Kevin Howard

I agree with you 100% Andrew.

For another example of laziness you only have to look at the air conditioning in the V8 Bristols. I don't know what they are doing today but even as late as the Blenheim 2 they were still using those ugly, inefficient "cassette" type air conditioners slung under the dash, which date back to the early 1970s. That's just a joke in a car in that price bracket.

The lack of development in the V8 Bristols is even more obvious when you look at the chassis, suspension and the power train.

However, rather than laziness this may have been down to economics. My guess is that the company was in terminal decline by the time Mr Silverton came along.

As for whether things like air con and electric rear windows matter, it all depends upon on how you use the car. If you keep your car under wraps in a dehumidified garage and drive it only on sunny Sundays then of course it doesn't matter and you should probably strive for originality. But if you want to use a classic car as a daily driver then a few niceties become more important.

I'm all for subtle/sympathetic modernisation of classic cars if they are to be used as a daily driver. The thread about electric rear windows is here .

In reference to this it is interesting to note that although Bristols historically have always been an aquired choice they were at least a competitive choice in the 50's and 60's and compared well to potential opposition such as Jensen, Facel Vega, Jaguar, Maserati, ISO, Rolls (maybe even some Ferraris) etc. I suppose they used to have access to BAC finance for a time, and Tony Crook, when he sold his successful consessionaries and bought into the company in the 1960's was probably the Toby Sliverton of the day so the cars were still being pretty well developed for a time during the 60's and early 70's.
You're right about the a/c system. I know it allows drivers to simultaniously cook their feet and freeze their eyeballs, but surely a bought-in smaller and more efficient dual zone climate system from the likes of Behr would be 'quite easy' to engineer into the car?

[TLF799R]

What is it with you boys - you claim to love the cars then all you do is run them down. If so much is wrong with them why have one???

Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't the Fighter have a specially developed air conditioning system, designed for the car at great cost?

It would have presumably been much easier, as other "supercars" do, to pinch theirs from cheap mass produced cars but Bristol didn't do that. They wanted to make their car smaller and lighter so they designed their own!

How can you possibly call that lazy???

When I win the lottery I am straight off to Kensington to order my new Bristol!

Philippa
p.s. Also am I not right that despite other comments on the lack of "proven safety features" Bristol has an exceptional safety record despite being a high performance car.

[quote=Kevin Howard;490]I agree with you 100% Andrew.

For another example of laziness you only have to look at the air conditioning in the V8 Bristols. I don't know what they are doing today but even as late as the Blenheim 2 they were still using those ugly, inefficient "cassette" type air conditioners slung under the dash, which date back to the early 1970s. That's just a joke in a car in that price bracket.
quote]

[Kevin H]

Originally Posted by 406Special

Now give me electric solenoid activated (or sprung cable operated) petrol filler cap or rear boot lid any time.

Now that really is a worthless mod, given that you have to get out of the car to put the petrol in anyway. Although I admit my V8 Aston Volante had exactly that feature (solenoid operated) and it was rather neat when you hit the switch and the two filler flaps popped open. Funny thing is, when I first bought the car, I went to put petrol in it and I couldn't find the release switch - it was in the glove box!

BUT, I wouldn't dream of retrofitting such a feature.