![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Other Cars Discussion about car marques other than Bristol |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
My 411 has been off the road for the last eight years and only ever once carried adults in the back that I can remember. Not that there were any complaints, but the passengers were female and it was a short trip. I guess it depends on the height of the driver and front passenger as well. It's all relative though. Of the cars mentioned none of them would have any more leg room that a V8 Bristol, and several would have considerably less. The only cars I can think of with really generous room in the back have been long wheelbase versions of more modern cars. |
|
|||
|
I had a Scimiter. Prefer the look of the earlier GTE over the later
Cologne engined model. Handles well. Enough grunt. Seats 4 at a bit of a pinch. Downsides are that they leak around the back window. Unless fixed, all of them overheat (there is a simple cure) I remember going to a meeting and noticing that everybody arriving popped the bonnet for a bit of extra ventilation as soon as they stopped! I became adept at changing warped cylinder heads. Fibreglass body is difficult to maintain to concours standard. I think they get tired. Last time I asked, parts were not a problem. Lancia Flavia: beautiful car. But the flat 4 is a bit slow. The bodies rust terribly and electric are a nightmare. I guess that spares would be a problem particularly in England where so few were sold. (Colin Dexter told me that he knows absolutely nothing about cars and it was a friend who told him that an eccentric like Morse should have a Lancia Flavia ... and that is the car that features in the early Morse novels. The Jag which appears in the films was purely the inspiration of the film producers.) Rover: agree with Kevin that the coupe looks fine. Used to have an early six cylinder which was dreadfully slow and thirsty. The V8 much better from that point of view but it's still a big old car. Awful rust around the wings. Handling? If you've ever been on a canal barge you'll know the feeling! Mercedes: I know nothing. Other suggestions: keep with Lancia. The Gamma was a fantastic car, whether in Berlinetta or Coupe mode. Either look great. Fantastic handling, more than adequate performance from the 2.5 flat 4. Early ones shed cam belts but I think the design was put right with the fuel injected models. It's the last true Lancia. Those that followed were Fiats. Wouldn't cost a lot either. Peter |
|
|||
|
Quote:
But still, it's problematic for people of more than 1.90 m because of the classic Jaguar roofline. I guess this is why the current XJ is considerably higher - but has lost this special appeal. The optimum for rear seat passengers would probably be a RR Phantom (old or new) or something like that. Regards, Markus |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Well sure, the S class is fine. And relatively easy to maintain, at least over here in Germany. Spare parts are also readily available and not very expensive.
If I lived in Britain, I probably would have an S class. But I just don't like seeing the same car at every corner. They are just too common here. I think in England, it's probably the other way round - the XJ is common and the S class exclusive. One of my neighbours has a 6.9 in very good condition with all options. But it seems he is not really able or willing to afford the maintenance. He only registered it again last year when it achieved "vintage status" (in Germany you can apply for that for cars older than 30 years, it means taxes are significantly lower then) and even so rarely uses it. Fuel consumption is really high for today's standards. Anyway, I personally prefer the 6.3 because of its classic body shape. The 6.9 is a bit too ostentatious for my taste. Regards, Markus |
|
|||
|
Markus, i live in Manchester in England and the Mercedes S-class, as well
as other models is a very common car in Manchester. The Jaguar XJ is a rarer car here as it has a bad image, too much of an old mans car i hear and lacks sophistication. I do like the S-class though. Andrew |
|
|||
|
Lacks sophistication?
That's funny. I think the ride in an XJ series X300 is still excellent, concerning the comfort aspect. Certainly better than in an S class up to and including the W126 series. For me, the Double Six was not planned as an everyday transport but then it turned out that it is so much more fun to drive than the E class (current model) that I use it very often, regardless of the fuel consumption which is twice the E class. Although the comparison is a bit unfair, as it is only the E 220. By the way, what is the image of Bristol in Britain, i.e. for people who even heared about the marque? Regards, Markus |
|
|||
|
When i say sophistication i mean more about the statement the car makes,
rather than the technological capabilities of the car. Sorry, i should have been clearer. I can understand the older man view of the car over here, but i don't agree with the sheep like views to so called style in this country. Jaguars are fine cars and like any other cars, you buy what you prefer. I think many of our nation need to take the image views of a car a little less seriously and just enjoy cars. Andrew |
![]() |
| Tags |
| alternatives, cars, ramblings |
|
|