Rear shoulder belt anchor point

[californiabristol]

Thanks to all for your advice and help.

Kevin, it is interesting to see that the factory placement for the rear(?) shoulder belt re-tractors are mounted on the longitudinal, rectangular-sectioned member out board of the fuel tank. This looks reinforced on your car. Your pictures are already very helpful. I have included some additional photos to show the current seat belt mountings on my car.
I am certain the rears are not original, and I believe I have receipts for their fitting. BCL would be the best source for advice. It won't hurt to ask.

Does the B-post mounting for the front shoulder belt guide look suspect to anyone?

Paul , I agree that the rear mounting is probably not safe, and the easiest solution would be to revert to simple lap belts as on John's Series 6
since the mounting points are already there. John, I am certain that the lower mounting points are original, but it would be good to get some
reliable, as-new images of the original seat belts for the forum(s). Pictures of your beautiful car would be nice in any case!

Paul D. good luck with your new seat belts from BCL. Please let me know how the new belts are mounted.

Thanks again,

Greg

[bkz411]

On my way out this morning I managed to take these pictures. Sorry for the dust, but I was in a rush and I have only noticed it now. The kids seats were in the back which must have hidden it from my view during my various cleans.
Not sure if these will be of any use, but hope they are of interest. I believe the back seat belts have three points, not two.

[Claude]

I have a bit of concern about the seat belt postings.

Doing a quick google search I found Car Crash Example that suggests a 30 mph crash puts about 1.5 tons of stress on the seat belt anchor points. At 60 mph this jumps to 9 tons, and it presumes a stopping distance of 1 foot. If the car hits a concrete wall with 0.01' stopping distance, the calculator jumps to 960 tons. Obviously the crumple effect of a Bristol will mitigate these numbers in real life. But if the belt gives way while the car is coming to rest, the g-forces on the body hitting the windscreen and dashboard will be horrible.

The problem with seatbelts is they only are tested once, and if they fail the results can be life altering. I am not sure if we have statistics on seatbelt-testing crashes in Bristols. I know that the BMW C1 web site had a page for crash reports, which we filed when the chairman of my charitable trust hit a car at 40 kph and walked away uninjured because the C1 has two shoulder belts and a lap belt. I wonder if we should not have a similar web page for Bristols. Kevin?

The problem with photographs of location in the Bristols is they do not tell us the most crucial part, what is holding the belts to the car and how strong is the mounting. This is a problem for both front and rear, as old Bristols lack a B pillar. If I ever get my 411 back on the road, it needs to pass VIN on seatbelt mountings, as approved by an engineer. The challenge is to determine how to do that best.

It would be helpful if Bristol Cars provided a certified instruction set that could be followed and signed off by the New Zealand inspector. Lacking that, it would be helpful if an engineering-oriented Bristol owner could provide an engineered solution that would not carry legal liability, but provide the crucial real-life information.

From my racing days, of course, a simple roll bar does the trick, a heavy piece of bent round steel with four mountings and a total of 16 large bolts braced in the floor. It may be that for the rear of a Bristol a similar U shaped piece of steel, perhaps in box form to lower its profile is way to address the rear.

Incidentally, in my Bristol 409 (under the old NZ rules), the engineer simply charged me $500 to advertise in an official NZ registry that the car had no place to mount shoulder belts in the front. Ironically, the car came with original Bristol aeroplane seat belts (the driver's one had a parachute icon on it). But those belts were deemed to not meet the NZ standard, so rather than allow them to remain and give some protection, the regulation required they be removed, giving no protection. Even more annoying the engineer decided they were surplus, and took them as a souvenir. Recovered one, the other one was "lost".

Claude

[lansdownplace]

Hi Claude,

Thank you for this very detailed posting. The forces involved are quite incredible.

My 412 has the front seat belt upper anchor fitted to the chassis member roughly where the rear passengers elbow rests in the back seat. You have to rummage around behind the front seat for the belt which is good for mobility I suppose.

The rear upper anchors are routed through a roller on the rear parcel shelf with the anchors bolted directly to a newly inserted chassis extension. I was mildly surprised at the cost of installing them as I thought it was just a case of bolting them in. It was markedly cheaper for me as the whole car was being disassembled anyway. Lap belts were a pretty cheap option but I think they look a bit messy and they do cause injuries which is why they are banned in new cars now. I was specifically warned about the problems of bolting them to the parcel shelf and the consequences.

Unfortunately I can't take any pictures as my car is in for some tuning tweaks at the moment.

Paul

[californiabristol]

Thanks for the images. I was looking at interior photos posted on the BOC site, and the front retractor mounting on top of the rear wheel well is common. The rears on your car appear the same as Howards. I can only hope my B-post
mounting location for the fronts is ok.

Greg Woog