![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi There
Could someone here please tell me if the spec and/or effectiveness of the brakes and rear axle changed from series 1 to series 2 on the 412? (Power dropped notably - 330 to 170hp, I think - and it's got me thinking...) Thank you and best wishes to all. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
FYI: If the 412 series 2 is fitted with the Chrysler E58 360 engine, then it would have produced in the region of 220bhp, a drop of some 40-50bhp from the E64 400 used in the series 1. The E57 360 produced 170bhp.
The E57 is distinguished by having a twin-barrel carburetor and single exhaust, as opposed to the E58, which has a four-barrel and twin exhausts. It was my understanding that Bristol used the E58 in the 603S and 412S2, although I could be wrong. The figures quoted are net. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't think so. And the headline power is not that different and the performance even less different given the weight saving. Peter
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Great.
Happy to hear it was 'born' with 220bhp, not 170! Currently having total engine rebuild as quite a few of those horses had escaped. Hopefully we will find bigger, stronger ones to replace them! Thank you both for your replies. |