WARNING Faulty 2 Litre engine cylinder head gaskets

The reason for my replying to this post was to say that the onus must lay with the engine builder and not the manufacturer of the gasket.
These gaskets are most likely made by "men in sheds" not computerized robots,
so once again check against the old gasket rather than blindly fitting it.
As for the manufacturer telling you that no one else has complained could well have been true as a competent and professional engineer would have checked old against new.
Do you not agree that the engine builder is at least partly to blame?
Roger

[Rubbond]

Eric,
This gasket looks well made and its age (unused) is irrelevant.
It presumably fits other engines, where that one hole is not required.
This is no longer amusing.
In my opinion you are a complete nutter.

[Hydroglen]

Roger,
I am not sure if your reply is to Eric or me. I agree that the engine
builder may have some blame. However you write
a competent and professional engineer would have checked old against new

Presumably when the "man in the shed" delivered the faulty gaskets "a
competent and professional engineer at Bristol would have checked old
against new" but maybe he was off on his tea break!! LOL

Regards
Dorien

[Eric Brumenil]

CODE OF PRACTICE ON VEHICLE SAFETY DEFECTS
This Code concerns cases where manufacturers, concessionaires or official/independent importers become aware of the existence of safety defects (as defined below) in units that are available for supply in the UK.
Supplier - is taken to mean vehicle or component/part producer/manufacturer, official/ independent importer, distributor or concessionaire.
CASES COVERED BY THE CODE
a; where evidence indicates the existence of a safety defect in the unit; and
b; the defect appears to be common to a number of units; and
c; units are available for supply in the UK.
It will be a matter of VOSA/supplier judgement to decide whether the number of units affected is sufficient to justify invoking the Code. A fixed numerical limit cannot be specified as the decision will take account of the degree of seriousness of any possible hazard involved.
CASES AFFECTING COMPONENTS OR PARTS
Safety defects covered by the Code include those relating to components or parts bought by suppliers from other (component/parts) manufacturers and (component/part) suppliers, whether sold with the vehicle as original equipment or supplied to the automotive aftermarket.
RECALL ARRANGEMENTS WITH INDIVIDUAL MANUFACTURERS
VOSA will require a supplier to notify it of the names of a recall coordinator and deputy with safety recall campaign responsibility.
CASES AFFECTING COMPONENTS OR PARTS
Safety defects covered by the Code include those relating to components or parts bought by suppliers from other (component/parts) manufacturers and (component/part) suppliers, whether sold with the vehicle as original equipment or supplied to the automotive aftermarket.
NOTIFICATION TO VOSA
Primary responsibility is that of the supplier to inform VOSA as soon as safety defect evidence requiring remedial action amounts to a case under the terms of the Code.
The Supplier shall at that stage indicate:
• the nature of the defect and estimated number of units involved;
• the nature of the safety hazard involved; and
• action planned at that time to remedy the defect
In cases where the defect appears to stem from a fault in a component/part produced by another supplier, that other supplier will also be notified and VOSA advised accordingly.
The Supplier will also inform VOSA of all subsequent decisions on remedial action. This includes cases in which component suppliers are involved, unless in the circumstances of the case it is agreed between the vehicle supplier and the appropriate component supplier for all remedial action to become the
responsibility of the component supplier, in which case the latter shall keep VOSA informed.
INITIATIVES BY VOSA IN PARTICULAR CASES
VOSA may wish to seek information from a supplier about safety defects that have been brought to their attention. In these cases, the supplier will pass all relevant information available, and cooperate with VOSA in establishing whether a defect is present.
The primary responsibility for deciding on remedial action lies with the supplier, but VOSA may, at its discretion, offer views and make recommendations on the measures proposed.
NOTIFICATION TO UNIT OWNERS
The supplier will take all reasonable action to contact affected owners/registered keepers and recall their vehicles/components/parts for inspection and, if necessary, rectify components or assemblies the supplier believes are safety defective.
In consultation with VOSA the supplier will send communication, in layman’s terms, to the owner/registered keeper, directly or through the franchised dealer network or through other methods explaining the nature of the defect and its safety significance. VOSA must be given the opportunity to comment on the content of and method of communication prior to instigating a campaign.
If the supplier or franchised dealer receives no response from the owner/registered keeper then further communication will be sent.
If requested, the DVLA will furnish the supplier with names and addresses of the owner/registered keepers shown on their record, in accordance with existing procedures. Alternatively DVLA can address and dispatch letters from the supplier to the owner/registered keeper at the suppliers request and cost.
Suppliers will notify VOSA of the response rate at three monthly intervals, until the recall action is complete or it is mutually agreed that the campaign be closed for reporting purposes.
PUBLICATION OF INFORMATION ON VEHICLE/COMPONENT/PART DEFECTS BY VOSA
VOSA reserves the right, under Ministerial authority, to publish at any time information of public interest. Before doing so, VOSA will consult the supplier, and where appropriate the component/part manufacturer/supplier concerned.
VOSA will not disclose publicly information on matters of commercial confidence unless there appear to be overriding safety considerations. Subject to this proviso, VOSA will also make public at regular intervals, summary information on action taken on cases notified under the Code. It will normally divert to a supplier more specific requests on particular cases.
IMPORTED UNITS
In the case of a recall affecting units imported by an independent importer, that importer shall bear the responsibilities specified in this Code.
If the independent importer is not available to undertake this obligation, then VOSA will contact the manufacturer of the affected units.
This Code will also apply to personally imported units, insofar as the supplier is able to identify the unit’s presence in the UK.
EXPORTED UNITS
The Code does not cover exported units. Measures to be taken in relation to these will depend upon the legal and administrative arrangements prevailing in the country of import. However, the sponsors of the Code are prepared to participate in any international discussions/agreements designed to harmonise arrangements governing notification of defects and related remedial action.
FURTHER INFORMATION
This Code of Practice is drawn up and has been revised as a consequence of the implementation of Directive 2001/95/EC on general product safety and the General Product Safety Regulations 2005 and is not intended to interpret, qualify or supplement English Law.
You retain your rights under the Regulations and copies can be obtained from The Stationery Office
Any further information is obtainable by contacting VOSA via the details provided below.
This Code of Practice is produced in tandem with the VOSA Guide to Recalls and acknowledged within the Europe Recall Guide.
For Further Information Contact: Vehicle Safety Branch, Vehicle and Operator Services Agency, Berkeley House, Croydon Street, Bristol, BS5 ODA. Tel: 0117-9543300 or VOSA corporate website

[Kevin H]

On the Bristol Cars web site it says:

"Bristol Cars have 98% of the original
machine parts drawings from the 1940's on.
If you require a part specially made
to original tolerances,
please ask and we will look into it."

I took this to mean that the parts would be accurate to the original drawings.

But after looking at that head gasket maybe it means if you require a part to original tolerances then it will need to be specially made

If a car manufacturer knowingly sold me a head gasket that had a cooling hole missing I would be pretty upset.

Bristol themselves could have punched the extra hole required before they sold the gasket - it should not be up to the customer to discover that there's a hole missing and punch it themselves!

[Hydroglen]

Right you are Kevin, and if after being upset you were told you were the
only customer to complain, your upset may raise to the poetic levels
described by Jim in Oregon.

Dorien

[Geoff Kingston]

Kevin
I recently fitted a head gasket set to a Cadillac that had one of the holes from the original design deleted and a note in the kit or the gasket manufacturers website,, I don't remember which, as to why that had been done. The car runs perfectly and does not overheat. The modification was to improve the water circulating characteristics of the engine so it isn't always safe to assume just because it isn't original it isn't right. Didn't I see some comments recently on cooling system mods on this site? If I did can you point me in the right direction as I have just bought a reconditioned 2 Litre engine from BCL and when installed in my 403 my aim is to return the car to normal every day use hence my interest in anything that will make the car practical in every day traffic without spoiling the essential character of the car, all ideas and suggestions welcome, except buying a V8 as I already have two of those on the road!!
Regards,
Geoff.

[Eric Brumenil]

Originally Posted by Rubbond

Eric,
In my opinion you are a complete nutter.

Dear Rubbond , are you Antony Steevenson from the Bristol Cars Ltd who wrote me a registered letter november 11 , 2010 ?
What is your position in the Bristol Cars Ltd ?

[GREG]

Yahoo, Mad Eric is back :-))

So, Rubbond is Anthony from Bristol cars -- Hmmm ! amazing disguise

One Flew Over The Cuckoos Nest land again..

Please tell us about the letter Eric - and how's life in Smurf land ?

Greg ex Senior Member

[Eric Brumenil]

This is a simple question .
I have recieved a letter from the factory signed by Antony Steevenson
He wrote me he was writing I am a complete nutter .
As far as I remember Rubbond wrote this
I am just interested to know who is Antony Steevenson , it's easier to know with whom you are talking

To answer you , yes the nutter is back
If you give me the right or your permission of course ?

[GREG]

Sorry Eric,

I did meet Antony at the Bristol celebrations at Filton recently. As far as I know he is a new sales man for Bristol and is ex Army.

I think Rubbond lives in another part of the world, but the word "Nutter" is quite a popular word and is often used to describe irrational behaviour.

I don't know either man but know of them.

I don't think you are a nutter ! Although you do jump to the wrong conclusion a lot !!


Greg - ex Senior Member

[GREG]

So you decided to let us know of a letter from BCL ! What was it about ?

Forget your conspiracy theories -- we don't know ??

If you are not going to tell us, why bother posting ?

Greg -- ex Senior Member