Unhappy postings
Claude your idea for a webmaster-supervised complaint section could be very
problematic in relation to potential libel suits. All complaints brought
before a court must have both sides heard; publishing just that of the
complainant would be foolish at best, downright libelous at worst.
In the event recently witnessed by us all only one side was presented,
containing some extremely serious allegations which if defended would
certainly have litigation potential. These allegations were repeated many
times, therefore magnifying any potential damage to the other party. Why
would any webmaster want to risk placing himself in a position equivalent to
that of the publisher of a book which later proved to be defamatory. In such
a case both the author and the publisher would have damages to pay.
On the other hand I like to read disaster tales as much as the next guy;
better in a Forum if no names given though!
I'm sure Kevin will do what he feels right.
Regards to all
Richard
|